Quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 162:1

ת"ל דם דם שיכול אין לי אלא אלו שנתערבו בתמורתה שאף מחיים תקרב מנין לרבות תודה ושלמים

<br> why is 'blood' repeated? For one might think: I only know about a burnt-offering which was mixed up with its substitute, for even [if they were mixed up] whilst alive, they must be offered. Whence do I know to include the thanksoffering and the peace-offering? I include the thanksoffering and the peace-offering, because they can be brought as a votive or a freewill-offering. like itself. Whence do I know to include the guilt-offering? I include the guilt-offering which requires four applications, like itself, Whence do I know [to include] a firstling, tithe, and the Passover-offering? Because it says, blood, blood. Now surely that speaks of the end of the burnt-offering and [the beginning of] the firstling; whence you may infer that the place of the burnt-offering is the place of the residue? - No: it speaks of the beginning of the burnt-offering and [that of] the firstling. What then does he inform us? that sacrifices do not nullify one another! [Surely] that is deduced from [the text]. And he shall take of the blood of the bullock and of the blood of the goat? - It is a controversy of Tannaim: one deduces it from this text, and another deduces it from the other text.

Explore quoting%20commentary for Zevachim 162:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.